The biggest downfall of the counterculture was due to the fact that many of the people who claimed the word counterculture were based on the archetype of the Dennis Hopper cha
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ddf9/0ddf99485be34ca857b7353c3fe58e9f4f94744b" alt=""
The counterculture did have some partial positives. It taught people that it was alright to live differently. Not everyone is meant to be bound into a world that constantly repeats itself day after day. The people who represented this type of lifestyle were truly groundbreaking because they could force themselves to forego the comforts that life could offer in order to obtain something far simpler for their simple lifestyle. One of these reasons we said that the two main characters from the movie failed was because they were trying to use money from a drug deal to begin their new life. They weren’t going for the simple ideals that the culture seemed to embrace. Had they done so they would have stayed at the developing commune they encountered in the beginning of the film. However, to put in a good word for Peter Fonda’s character it looked as though he was content in that position. He knew the lifestyle that he wanted, but he let Dennis Hopper steer them away from what was right. Ultimately the two were killed because of the lifestyle that they embraced. Although the hatred was exaggerated it makes the prejudice that was placed on the group as a whole grossly apparent and disgusting.
Although I don’t embrace the idea of the counterculture, I think that if you can use drugs and still be a functional member of society then why not do it? It’s something that is fun, it’s different, and altogether it’s generally a good time, however I know from experience that no drug leaves you completely functional. Therefore when I try to sympathize with their way of thinking I find nothing but opposition.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I found Dennis Hopper's character to be the paragon of the counterculture movement. While Peter Fonda's character was bogged down by ideals, his counterpart's lifestyle was maintainable because its only principle was having fun and good times.
ReplyDeleteI agree that LSD led to the downfall of the coutner culture movement but don't you think it was critical in the goals they were trying to achieve? If they were seeking a new way to experience the world then don't you think they found one, even if it was not sustainable?
ReplyDeleteYeah, I understand what you're saying but acid is just too far out there. You can't expect something so harsh and contaminating to be so revolutionary as to change the way people think. I mean from what my dad told me about acid it's almost impossible to come to coherent conclusions about what is happening to your own body, let alone an entire population of others. It clearly was just not meant to be. But I do give the hippies props for doing it their way.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the counter culture would have been a lot more successful with out LSD. Jason... sorry, but if you think that then you don't know much about the counter culture.
ReplyDeleteYou really hit on how the hedonism that comes with cool very often can eventually bring cool down. I agree with you to a certain point on drugs, but there is something about drugs that encourage another world view entirely. I recommend you do some reading about Timothy Leary and other drug advocates and extend that last point.
ReplyDelete